Article
Ordinance No. 275/2025/1 and traditional aromatisation methods
This article examines Ordinance No. 275/2025/1 of 31 July, which lays down complementary national rules on the traditional production methods used for the aromatisation of brandy, wine spirit and grape marc spirit under Regulation (EU) 2019/787.
This English version follows the Portuguese VinumLex original and is presented here for informative reading. The Portuguese original remains the reference source for archival purposes.
Open Portuguese originalPortuguese editorial article
Why the ordinance matters
- EU law establishes as a general rule that brandy, wine spirit and grape marc spirit may not be aromatised, except where traditional production methods are allowed.
- However, the EU framework does not specify in concrete terms which traditional methods are admissible.
- The new Portuguese ordinance is therefore significant because it fills a clear domestic normative gap while preserving historically rooted practices.
Historical Portuguese background
- The article recalls that older Portuguese legislation already left room for accepted ingredients, technological practices and product-enhancing methods, even if it did not expressly codify aromatisation techniques in the modern sense.
- That historical background supports the view that such practices were culturally present and legally tolerated, even without precise positive-law formulation.
- The new ordinance can thus be read not as an invention of new methods, but as a formal recognition and delimitation of existing traditional knowledge.
Legal significance
- The ordinance matters both for legal certainty and for heritage protection: it allows operators and control bodies to know which processes remain compatible with the national and EU framework.
- It also helps defend the Portuguese specificity of wine-derived spirits against a purely abstract reading of the EU ban on aromatisation.
- The text fits into a broader effort to preserve traditional spirit-making practices without abandoning regulatory discipline.
Editorial conclusion
- Ordinance No. 275/2025/1 is important because it gives positive legal form to practices that were historically rooted but insufficiently codified.
- Its relevance goes beyond technical production rules: it concerns legal recognition of cultural continuity in Portuguese spirits.
- The broader lesson is that heritage and precision in regulation do not have to be opposites.
Notice
Content of a general and purely informative nature. For comments or further information, please contact joao@joaoamaral.law.
